RSS

Category Archives: OT

The one where I’m back

Well. It’s been a while. See, on March 15 I lost my job, and had to fight for unemployment benefits, which took until mid week last week – so nearly a month passed without income. So I have spent the past month pretty much curled up in a depressed, embarrassed, angry, scared ball. However, now I am getting the stipend, such as it is, and can actually do things like breathe and sleep and buy groceries, and maybe I can claw back a little of my life and start writing things again. That would be cool.

And until I get a review or anything else useful written, there’s this that I just received in my inbox:

Screenshot - 4_18_2013 , 3_01_34 PM

 

I have free time. When do I leave?

 

 
14 Comments

Posted by on April 18, 2013 in OT

 

Tags: , ,

DebraLee Hovey does NOT represent Connecticut.

Apparently over the weekend Republican Connecticut Representative DebraLee Hovey had a hissy fit on Facebook. You see, last week the amazing Gabby Giffords came to Connecticut and visited the families of the students of Newtown, of Sandy Hook Elementary. I welled up when I heard she was coming.

Hovey? Not so much.

“Gabbie Giffords stay out of my towns” was her reaction, with multiple exclamation points. She has since apologized, and I can’t even find a Facebook page for her now – smart moves, taken, I’m sure, only because my deep contemptful anger is probably a mild reaction compared to those of Newtowners.

Ms. Hovey, you’re called a state representative. If this is an example of your representation of this state, I’m nauseated. I’m joyful that you don’t represent my town, and I earnestly hope this incident is remembered come election time. In fact, I’ll make sure of it.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on January 7, 2013 in OT

 

Tags:

Well, I’m back. I hope

This has, to put it mildly, been an interesting couple of months. As in the Chinese curse “May you live in interesting times”. A hurricane, followed a week later by a nor’easter. Then my mother had a fall, which resulted in a push-and-pull nightmare struggle with the hospital that lasted two more weeks. (It isn’t over yet, but I’m trying not to think about it, and since Mom is doing much better I can almost put it behind me.) Then we lost Daisy. Then I finally brought my car to be serviced for a coolant leak it had had for a while, and that wound up being $1000 (and 74 cents, which I just think is funny). It still needs another $300 worth of work, but it’ll have to wait a bit. Then there was the Newtown shooting. (Guy Gavriel Kay wrote an amazing piece about it, here.)Then we decided to adopt a shelter dog – a beagle (coincidentally)- Jack Russell mix, coincidentally, painfully also called Daisy (we tried to change it, but Mom keeps calling her Daisy anyway, so… ow. Oh well). (Pictures to follow soon. She’s adorable. A PITA, but adorable.) Then Daisy II turned out to a) be far from housebroken (not that we really expected her to be), and b) have kennel cough. Which meant that my brother – who has two dogs of his own, one of whom is getting old and isn’t 100% – didn’t want to take a chance on coming here for Christmas as planned. Which meant that we didn’t really have a Christmas. Maybe around New Year’s. I haven’t even wrapped anything yet.

I feel like I forgot something. Oh, right – our furnace stopped working. Knew there was something.

It’s all been a perfect set of examples of what I have long referred to as “the Stewart luck” – it sucks, but it could be worse; it’s all about a quarter of an inch short of impossible.(You know the other saying “what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger”? Bollocks.)

The result of all of this has been that I’ve been about a step away from zombie for about two months. It seems like every time I’ve picked my head up and started to smile again there’s been another piano falling from the sky, alternating of course with the occasional anvil. So this blog has suffered … I have managed to scrabble out a few book reviews here and there, and what I aim to do is plop them up here, scheduling a few out to give myself a breather; that’s how I managed the last batch around the time we lost Daisy.

Nearly every week (mostly on Tuesdays and Wednesdays) something dreadful has happened, either to us directly or to the state. I’m still a little afraid of what the next week will bring. I’m only hoping that 2013 will be … different. I’m not sure I even ask for significantly better right now; just … not worse. Here’s hoping. If the posts stop again you’ll know the streak of evil luck continues … :)

 
2 Comments

Posted by on December 26, 2012 in OT

 

Tags: , , , ,

One degree from Jeopardy!

sshot-41I’ve been trying to watch Jeopardy every night since the audition – just because I like the show, of course, and for obvious practical reasons (got to keep my hand in!) – but also because there were some terrific people in that audition room back in June in New York, and at least some of them HAVE to be chosen for the show.

So there I was the other night (Wednesday? The days have all run together …), and I said “Hey. The man on the right looks really familiar.” It wasn’t till Alex Trebek did the mini-inteview with him that I knew for sure that the gentleman all the way to the right – Todd Federman – was indeed the man from my audition group. Well done, Todd! I think he got out-buzzered in the beginning, but he came in a very respectable second.

And I am now one degree removed from the show. With thirteen more months left in which they can call me … I keep forgetting that. I really should be studying still… Back to the books!

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 1, 2012 in OT

 

Tags: ,

Is it over? Really over?

I can’t believe I’ve been hiatusing (shush – it’s a word now) for this long, but there it is. I think I said it in one of those last posts: what happened at my old place of work had both nothing and everything to do with me. It impacted me, for sure; it’s been a strange place, my little world, for the last month or so,

So what brings me back today?

All I can say is, I am – as far as returns are showing so far – very relieved and proud of my state right now. Not only is it a lovely shade of blue right now, there’s that other thing – and I already said this on Facebook (and I never go on Facebook anymore):

Imagine all the things that could be done with $100 million. Let me spell that out: One Hundred Million Dollars.

One thing that **can’t** be done with $100 million?

You can’t buy a senate seat.

Thank God.

After SEVEN HORRIFIC MONTHS of McMahon commercials – ding dong the witch has lost!

Again.

Maybe she’ll go away now? For good? Please?
 
Leave a comment

Posted by on November 6, 2012 in OT

 

Tags:

Hiatus

And once again I’m looking at an unintentional hiatus. My home internet connection died a couple of days ago, and when I finally got the provider they let me know it’s on my end: either the cable going from the wall to the modem … or the modem. Cable – about $15. Modem – about $70. Guess which one I think it is.

Payday’s next Monday, so I won’t be doing much of anything before then. Le sigh.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on October 15, 2012 in OT

 

Tags:

The evil that men do

How’s that for a cliché for a title. Guess I’m not too creative right now.

Last spring I was called for jury duty, to the Superior Court in New Haven. The minute I said that in front of my sister, her one-word response was “Komisarjevsky.” And I said “Noooo. No, it can’t be.” But it was. I arrived on my appointed day, and was called not long after the lunch break, and I started to get a bad feeling when an unusually large number of people was called. And then when the clerk in charge of the big group asked who among us were teachers or students, my stomach sank: that must mean what they expected to be a long trial. There were other indicators, and sure enough we were filed into a small courtroom – and there he was. A child-murdering monster. Evil. He didn’t look it. But he scared me. I had never – until yesterday – been more grateful to escape anything than I was to be excused from that trial. The horror of what he and his partner did is not something that should ever be ignored, but I also was terrified of the idea of the details being pounded into me, never to fade. It was the first time I was highly conscious of being in the presence of evil.

Yesterday I learned of another evil I once spent a lot more time around. I didn’t recognize it for what it was until after the fact; at that point I predicted mayhem. I never thought I’d really be right. It’s a little like saying that a major fault line is bound to be the site of a huge earthquake, and then still being surprised and horrified when a city is leveled.

Almost three years ago my boss at the time called me into the conference room and informed me that because of the economy they had to reduce the office staff, and I was it. It was actually very gentle; it was only afterward that it got ugly. I was angry, and hurt; I vented in a series of blog posts about the whole situation, and part of that was exploring the fact that if you look up the definition of “psychopath” you can find a checklist of twenty items. The more of these a person exhibits, the more likely they are to be a very literal psychopath. It’s not just some internet meme – it’s a legitimate (afaik) diagnostic tool called the Hare Psychopathy Checklist. Without stretching I found I could easily apply the first thirteen to him; two more fit him if they were not canceled out by the “Pathological lying”.

After I left the place I started hearing stories. Stories involving his temper, which I knew about – and involving guns, which I knew he loved, but not to what extent. For three years now I have been grimly predicting that he was either going to kill his wife and children one day, or open fire on the office. I actually have cringed a little every time there was a shooting in New Haven, where the company is located. I took down the blog posts, because I was frankly afraid.

Then, I heard, at the beginning of this year the board of the company – which consists of the family, it being a company started by my former boss’s father – ousted the man I’d worked for and placed his brother in full charge. I have no idea what the specifics were; it’s easy to assume that they finally decided he was just too big a loose cannon to not be a detriment to the company. He didn’t take it well. But that was at the beginning of the year. Which was why I was so shocked when yesterday morning my current boss said “Didn’t you work for a company in New Haven?” “Yes – why?” “There was a shooting.”

My ex-boss went to the factory this morning, waited for and shot his brother in the parking lot, then drove to their parents’ house and shot himself.

Between them they left four small children. Not to mention wives, and parents who now have no sons. The company can’t but suffer, so that’s some 50+ dependent employees who will have to endure. Me? I’m just in shock. I’m grateful he didn’t do what I expected him to do. Also, he was a rabid (and I use the word advisedly) Republican; I always figured if he didn’t damage his family or the office he would attempt to take out a Democratic gathering. He wished harm on Obama, frequently (and other leading Democrats), and I always had a hope that he had said things publicly enough that he was under surveillance by the FBI – because there was a – pardon the pun – deadly seriousness to the threats. Had he ever been in the same place at the same time as the President, I have absolutely no doubt but that there would have been an Incident.

And it’s just really, really strange that I never have to worry about it again. It’s not like it was ever the prevailing concern of my day-to-day existence, but it was there, every time a news crew was in New Haven, every time I heard about a workplace shooting. Every time I heard Obama was coming to Connecticut. And now something’s happened. With all due recognition of the horror of it, it wasn’t the worst that could have been – I would have definitely called a higher body count. Much. But.

But, see, there’s another part of it. I spent a year and a half in that office. I had interviewed there in … 2007? And it was the best interview ever. It was fun. I have never had another fun job interview – apart from the second one I had there when I was laid off from my next job. See, I was offered the job after the fun interview, but I was also offered another one five minutes from home. I took the one with the proximity over the one with the fun, with a few regrets. When that one ended, I emailed the other place – and half an hour later had a new interview lined up. And it was even more fun than the first one. It was all very flattering, too – they remembered me, and were delighted I was going to be joining them. And there were times, early on, when that was the best job I ever had. I was challenged, and I grew. I baked for that office regularly: I love to bake, and they liked what I made, and it was fun. I had political discussions with the boss. We were on the opposite ends of the spectrum, which would normally be a recipe for disaster, but he was able to keep it more than civil; I learned a lot (though not a thing that changed my mind), and he might have even learned something. He was unstinting with praise when he set a challenge and the challenge was met. He used to play “Name That TV Theme Tune” over the PA system. He was a foodie: one day he cooked us a prime rib dinner with all the fixings that was one of the best meals I ever ate. He made his own wine and encouraged sampling of it in the office, and took us out for drinks or dinner now and then, and every person who came in for a job interview laughed. A lot.

And that’s the thing. There were a lot of job interviews, because in the short time I was there he fired or laid off six people (culminating with me) in a small office where there were usually only five desks occupied, all with little or no reason, and no notice – no preliminary warnings, nothing, just take ‘em into the conference room and then they’re out the door with a box. Since I left I know of at least three or four more. He was as unstinting with condemnation as he was with praise, and it was a lot easier to earn condemnation; try being two minutes late to a production meeting. I still have the scars. The fact that I don’t cry as easily as I once did is thanks to him – I learned not to let him make me cry. The person who was let go a few months before me has been reacting on Facebook about his evil, and the hate in his eyes – and that’s as true as the rest of it. He could be incredibly scary. I’ll remember those eyes always.

I’ll also always remember giving him a hug before we left for the one Christmas I was there.

And the rage in his face when he talked about killing the entire Obama family.

And the time he extolled my baking to someone as he introduced me to.

And the time he flayed me alive for misplacing a sticky note.

And talking to him about just how he got those shrimp at the Fourth of July cookout to taste so amazing.

And the vicious commentary he passed about one of my friends in front of the rest of the office.

And his warmth when he hired me (and while I was still “flavor of the month”).

And the coldness with which he changed the story after he laid me off to try to deny me unemployment benefits.

And the horror with which I listened to all the stories that came flooding out after I was out of there, of guns and anger and violence – on both brothers’ parts. I didn’t know the brother who was killed as well as I (thought I) knew the killer. His was a sharper intelligence; neither of them was stupid, but the one who was shot used his intelligence as a weapon. But when he felt like it he could settle in for as good a conversation as any – except that his overall air was that he didn’t have time for that kind of nonsense. I never cared about him as much as I did his brother – but I never hated him as much as I did his brother, either.

This is a very strange feeling. It has nothing to do with me – and everything to do with me. I’ve never known anyone who was murdered before. I’ve never known anyone who became a murderer before. I’ve never been so sharply aware of – and this isn’t really intended as a pun – a bullet dodged, for myself and for the friends who continued to work in that office.

And I don’t really know how to process any of it.

 
9 Comments

Posted by on October 9, 2012 in family, OT

 

The Scientific Sherlock Holmes – James O’Brien

 

When I think of Holmes, I think of a scientific method of deduction. I think of a human version of a CSI lab before there were CSI labs, able to observe and interpret the smallest grains or threads of evidence and effortlessly build a case against the evil evildoer. I admit, I haven’t read the canon lately, so I have to take the author’s word for it when numbers are cited – the frequency of occasions when Holmes used a magnifying glass or a microscope, or dabbled in chemistry. Which I have no problem doing – it’s obvious that Mr. O’Brien was thorough in his tallies. He’s thorough in every aspect of the book. Which, in a way, is why it did not rate more than three stars.

Let me ‘splain.

This book reminded me a little of one of the Shakespeare biographies I’ve encountered lately, which tries to bake a cake with about a half a cup of batter. The author presents the little information that exists from a different angle, and basically fills in the rest with art and artifice – like using a styrofoam layer for that cake. With The Scientific Sherlock Holmes, the idea is a good one: see, this is how Sherlock Holmes used science in his investigations. The practice, though, brings in the styrofoam. There are fifty-six short stories and four novels (“long stories”) in the canon, and when all is said and done there isn’t much more batter to work with here than for a Shakespeare bio.

The book is broken into sections relating to the different sciences, and each one augments the information derived from the Holmes canon with anecdotes from reality, and discussion of where Doyle obtained his information. The section on fingerprinting, for example, is a nice little history of the science, including its earliest appearance in fiction in Mark Twain’s Pudd’nhead Wilson. The section on astronomy – dealing more with Moriarty than with Holmes – brings in an acquaintance of Doyle’s who was the likely source for the references. The section on handwriting analysis goes into some detail about the Lindbergh kidnapping, among others, and that on footprints (which was a little disappointing; I didn’t realize footprint evidence had been so thoroughly discredited) went into the OJ Simpson trial (which was surprising).

Another way in which the little available material was puffed up to fill the 208 pages was simple repetition. Some of the same points were made (in nearly the same phrasing) two or more times. In a longer work reiteration can be helpful, but this was fairly brief (and illustrations, an appendix, bibliography, and index took up a fair amount of space). (The appendix is concerned with the totally off-topic but wildly weird and interesting “Doyle conspiracies” – I had no idea that he was blamed for everything from an archaeological hoax to, God bless us, the Jack the Ripper killings. There’s a certain irony to the latter given that the most recent Holmes I’ve read was [book:Dust and Shadow].)

The exploration of science in the Holmes stories was fun and interesting, but where it would have made for an excellent longish article, it simply was not enough to fill a book.

This was a Netgalley advance copy, read with thanks.

 

 
2 Comments

Posted by on October 2, 2012 in books, history, mystery, OT

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

This is also not a political post …

I had no plans to follow up that other post, but – dear lord, it’s only the middle of September and I’m already about to go mad. By the beginning of November these endless, mindless commercials will have me gibbering and strait-jacketed.

New Linda McMahon commercial (radio, and thus unavoidable, God help me): “Linda’s tax cuts only affect the middle class – her own taxes would not change at all.”

So what is Linda supposed to be – upper class?

In a pig’s eye. She’s rich. There is no class there.

Also, when the presidential candidates suspended their campaigns out of deference to the remembrance of September 11, McMahon, if anything, stepped up her efforts. I don’t recall hearing or seeing an ad from her opponent, but she demonstrated a marked lack of respect for the day by bulling right on with her endless spew of wasted money. I wrote to her website asking why; somehow I’m not surprised I didn’t get an answer. At least they’re not spamming my email address.

Is it election day yet?

 
3 Comments

Posted by on September 13, 2012 in OT

 

Tags: ,

This is not a political post

It really isn’t about politics. It’s more about the basic quality of life in an election cycle, and about common sense and WTFery and things like that.

Ever since the last election cycle, the two dirtiest words in my household have been “Linda McMahon”. That name is enough to make my ordinarily very mild mother’s eyes blaze. It’s not because McMahon’s a Republican – no one in my family has ever been very political, and my one venture into giving a damn did not end well on a personal level; that period was the death knell for any optimism and eagerness that was left alive in me. I don’t care anymore. We don’t care what McMahon’s politics are; I couldn’t even tell you what her campaign promises are (we mute every commercial possible, and when it’s not possible tune them out). At this point she could be running a save-the-puppies campaign and I wouldn’t vote for her if you paid me.

Here’s the thing: she’s rich as Croesus. Now, I admit it: that’s automatically a black mark against a person in my book, to remain a negative unless mitigating factors can be presented. (I admit it freely – it’s my one prejudice.) Mitigating factors can include: a hell of a lot of hard work to earn the money. An attitude showing a marked lack of rubbing anyone’s face in it. A dedication to using said money to help others.

McMahon’s commercials usually aim at factor #1: Linda worked so very hard to get where she is! Okay. And in what field did she work?

Professional wrestling.

Words cannot express the horror with which that fills me.

But – thank God – she is no longer wrestling (as far as I know), and supposedly this sordid past brought jobs to the state back in the day, so, fine. I can get over it – even the little snippet an opponent once brought out of her on all fours and barking like a dog in the ring.

What negates any positive factors that do or could ever exist for this woman is her financial aggressiveness toward getting the job of senator for this state. In the last campaign, she bragged that she was willing to spend $50 million of her own money on the election. I believe the final number was bigger than that. That right there? Goes against possible mitigating factor #2: it is rubbing her money in the face of everyone with less, and basically admitting to making a damned good attempt at buying a senate seat.

What did she get for her money?

She didn’t get the job.

Instead, what she bought was the undying loathing of every member of my family (and not a few others I’ve spoken to). Why? Because she’s bloody everywhere. Every television and radio commercial break – since APRIL – has included a McMahon commercial. Her (already unpleasant) voice has become more and more (and MORE) irritating as time has passed. She has been advertised in more different commercials than Coca Cola – more even than Viagra and its counterparts. That’s probably the biggest part of what all that money bought her, for the last election; I don’t think she’s bragged about what she’s shelling out for this one.

Some of the rest went to making hers a multi-media campaign of aggravation. I am a registered independent (because I find both parties equally repugnant and equally nothing I want to be associated with). My mother is a registered Democrat. So I would absolutely love an explanation as to why we have received not only mailings but telephone calls – plural – from the McMahon campaign.

Fifty million dollars … she’s spent more than twice that by now, is my guess. A hundred mill would buy a lot of textbooks for struggling school systems, or – oh, I don’t know, food for people who don’t have any. (See #3, above.) For it to be pissed away on such garbage as this (probably fruitless, or so I pray) campaign makes me literally physically ill.

Maybe the media consultants and those who produce the commercials have been counted into those 600 jobs she keeps boasting about.

Speaking of prompting – what’s prompted me to dash off this post is yet another irritation of those radio ads I can’t avoid: she is constantly berating those “career politicians” who haven’t miraculously fixed the world yet. And every single time I wonder: why is it so awful to be a “career politician” but not what she has become – a career politician-wannabe?

———————————————————————–

What I said over two years ago still stands, too…

 
6 Comments

Posted by on September 9, 2012 in OT

 

Tags: ,

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 243 other followers

%d bloggers like this: